New York Times Magazine Article on the Politics of Immigration
The New York Times Magazine (October 15) has an interesting article entitled “The Border Dividing Arizona” by JOSEPH LELYVELD on the politics of immigration during an election year. It starts like this:
When House Republicans calculated that their best bet for saving their majority was to run this fall as if illegal immigration and border security were the most urgent issues facing the country — bigger by far than that great unmentionable, Iraq — they were finally speaking the language of a Republican state legislator from Mesa, Ariz., named Russell Pearce. The Arizonan was there before Tom Tancredo, the Colorado congressman who talks of making a run for the White House on the issue; there before even Lou Dobbs and Rush Limbaugh if not Pat Buchanan. A fast-talking former cop, Pearce went into electoral politics only after it became clear that he wouldn’t soon be able to realize his dream of becoming sheriff of Maricopa County, the area around Phoenix where more than half of Arizona lives. As a lawmaker, Pearce hasn’t just embraced the issue of illegal immigration as a tactic; for him it’s a passion — his opponents say an obsession — “the root cause” of almost any other problem Arizona and the nation face. Talk about terrorists and high crime rates, he’ll say the border is undefended. Are schools failing? They’re being overwhelmed by “a population that don’t put a high value to education.” Are there a million people in Arizona without health care? “Yeah, they broke into the country illegally. They came into the country poor, they’re gonna stay poor. You’ve imported them!”
Click here for the full story.
On eof the fascinating aspects of the immigration debate is that it is not simply a Red State/Blue State, Liberal/Conservative issue. There are restrictionist (and pro-immigrant) wings of both the Republican and Democratic Parties. We will see how the immigration debate of 2006 plays out in the elections of 2006. it should be an interesting November!
KJ