New Immigration Articles

Alexandre, Michele. At the intersection of post-911 immigration practices and domestic policies: can Katrina serve as a catalyst for change? 26 Chicana/o-Latina/o L. Rev. 155-167 (2006).

Colin, Helene C. Comment. No hablo ingles: waivers to the English language requirement for naturalization. 37 Cal. W. Int’l L.J. 329-358 (2007).

Di Iorio, William R. Note. Mending fences: the fractured relationship between Native American tribes and the federal government and its negative impact on border security. 57 Syracuse L. Rev. 407-428 (2007).

Gul, Saad. Return of the Native? An assessment of the citizenship renunciation clause in Hamdi’s settlement agreement in the light of citizenship jurisprudence. 27 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 131-167 (2007).

Panezi, Maria. The 2005 Asylum Procedures Directive: developing the European asylum law. 13 Colum. J. Eur. L. 501-512 (2007).

Silva, S. Anthony. Comment. Immigration: the Fifth Circuit refuses to automatically toll voluntary departure while a motion to reopen is pending, creating new hazards for alien and practitioner alike. (Banda- Ortiz v. Gonzales, 445 F.3d 387, 5th Cir. 2006.) 37 U. Mem. L. Rev. 429- 453 (2007).

Thomas, Nicole J. Note. “They told me he said he would kill me.” Why hearsay should get full weight in asylum proceedings. (Gu v. Gonzales, 454 F.3d 1014, 9th Cir. 2006.) 37 Cal. W. Int’l L.J. 299-328 (2007).

Westover, Blair T. Note. Cultural assimilation as a mitigating factor to immigration offenses under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. 10 J. Gender Race & Just. 349-381 (2007).

Crossing the Line? Examining Current U.S. Immigration & Border Policy. Articles by Natsu Taylor Saito, M. Isabel Medina and Patricia Medige. 10 J. Gender Race & Just. 193-284 (2007).

Symposium Issue: “9/11”: Effects on U.S. Law. Featured contributors: Jeffrey A. Botelho, Editor; Tung Yin, Charles S. Doskow, Saby Ghoshray, Michael J. Sherman, Karl T. Gruben, Donald S. Dobkin and Robert G. Ansel. 19 St. Thomas L. Rev. 151-360 (2006).

Berman, Moshe S. Note. The appropriate response of the United States to forced abortion in China: should section 601(a) of the IIRIRA be extended to allow asylum for unmarried couples? 41 New Eng. L. Rev. 339-377 (2007).

Gordon, Jennifer. Transnational labor citizenship. 80 S. Cal. L. Rev. 503-587 (2007).

Hobbins, Margaret. Comment. The day laborer debate: Small Town, U.S.A. takes on federal immigration law regarding undocumented workers. 6 Conn. Pub. Int. L.J. 111-141 (2006).

Hodges, Lynn S. Note. Domestic silence: how the U.S.-Canada-Safe-Third- Country Agreement brings new urgency to the need for gender-based-asylum regulations. 30 Vt. L. Rev. 1045-1078 (2006).

Jordan, Jamie. Note. Ten years of resistance to coercive population control: section 601 of the IIRIRA of 1996 to section 101 of the REAL ID Act of 2005. 18 Hastings Women’s L.J. 229-248 (2007).

Stewart, Sara E. Case note. The circuits split on the issue of whether marital status is dispositive of asylum eligibility in the United States for individuals who suffer persecution under China’s coercive family planning practices. (Lin v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 416 F.3d 184, 2d Cir. 2005.) 59 Me. L. Rev. 169-189 (2007).

KJ