More on 212(c) and the Blake Case

Thanks to Dan Kowalski for this reaction to the post yesterday about 212(c), the Ninth Circuit and Blake:

Eleventh Circuit to follow Second on Blake?

“Without expressing any opinion about the issues raised in Palomino’s petition for review or Palomino’s eligibility for § 212(c) relief, we GRANT the petition, VACATE the order denying reconsideration, and REMAND this case to the BIA for the purpose of allowing the BIA to consider Palomino’s motion to reconsider in light of Blake v. Carbone.” Palomino-Abad v. U.S. Atty. Gen’l., July 10, 2007.

http://bibdaily.com/pdfs/Palomino-Abad%2011%207-10-07.pdf

bh