The Overlooked Legal Challenge to Trump’s Travel Ban
With the Supreme Court hearing oral arguments tomorrow morning in the travel ban case, here is something clearly worth reading.
The statutory arguments related to the Travel Ban litigation are certainly something our community has been discussing for some time, but they’re less prevalent in the public discourse.
For those interested, here’s a short article on the Harvard Law Review’s blog that Fatma Marouf, Sabi Ardalan, and Philip L. Torey authored discussing why the Immigration and Nationality Act’s text, structure, and prior usage preclude the President from wielding the sort of delegated authority he proclaims to have in enacting the Travel Ban. The post is largely based on the amicus brief submitted with the Court.
KJ
Posted in: